The evolution of medicine hasn't always been smooth. It's enough to recall the stories of bloodletting, radioactive ointments, sleeping pills that caused deformities in children, and so on. There have been many such stories throughout history, and they still happen today. Harmful drugs still exist in the pharmaceutical market. By harmful, I mean a questionable benefit-to-harm ratio.
Pharmaceutical companies, owned by entire dynasties, have been in this market for a long time and have become quite sophisticated at foisting their products on people. They have begun indirectly funding separate organizations that act as a kind of jury, approving or denying drugs before they hit the market. For example, in the US, such an organization is the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) .
For many ordinary people, this organization has become something of a seal of approval for pharmaceuticals, and this is partly true. However, those familiar with the concept of propaganda know about Goebbels' "40/60" method, which involves 60% truth and 40% misinformation for their own interests. This is roughly how pharmaceutical companies and their lobbyists at the FDA operate: 60% truth about a drug's benefits, the other 40% misinformation about harm and consequences—relatively speaking, of course. 
Some of you might say I'm spouting some kind of conspiracy theory. 
I'll answer that: I'm NOT talking about all medications. Of course, the FDA approves beneficial medications that have very little harm and great benefit, but that's the same 60% figure.
If you want to see my point, Google the story of OxyContin and Purdue Pharma (they made a good TV series about it called "Withdrawal"). Google the story of the sleeping pill Thalidomide , which left 12,000 children with birth defects and was approved by the FDA twice (!!). Or Google the new story about the Alzheimer's drug Aducanumab . There's plenty of information about similar situations; you just need the desire and skills to analyze it.
https://meduza.io/feature/2021/12/03/kak-pfizer-blagodarya-svoey-vaksine-ot-kovida-stala-samoy-moguschestvennoy-farmatsevticheskoy-kompaniey-v-mire
https://meduza.io/feature/2020/10/23/kompaniya-purdue-pharma-priznala-chto-vinovata-v-organizatsii-opioidnoy-epidemii-v-ssha-teper-ee-zakroyut
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%B4
https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-57392818
Итак, мой список актуальных вредных препаратов, что одобрила FDA:
Новые мРНК вакцины. Да да, баян, но у них соотношение польза\вред плохое. Я уже писал о публикации где доказали миокардит с вакцинацией у молодых людей.
Есть еще данные о различных синдромах. Например синдром Рамсея- Ханта от которого недавно внезапно пострадали Бибер, Чубайс, Потап и другие люди что поверили врачам и новым вакцинам. О внезапных смертях вы и без меня слышали\видели.. А вот кто увидел пользу
Например я увидел пользу только для акционеров пфайзер, чьи акции взлетели просто в космос
Статистики не подтверждают что мы излечили ковид, более того осенью и зимой нас ждет новая волна.
Кроме этого, мы не знаем как бы все закончилось без вакцинации. Но нам упорно говорят что плохо, мне смешно это слушать Т.е на 100% оценить эффективность этих вакцин можно только так:
Если бы было две одинаковые планеты земля, где одновременно началась пандемия, и одной планете начали давать вакцины, а на второй нет — тогда это наглядный опыт эффективности вакцин, а все остальное — оплаченные фармкомпаниями мероприятия.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0
https://pmj.bmj.com/content/early/2022/01/05/postgradmedj-2021-141022
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450380/
Парацетамол и НПВП. Да, каждый из нас хоть раз пил от температуры парацетамол или нестероидные противовоспалительные препараты типа нимесила. Так вот вы знали что парацетамол вызывает астму или аутизм? Не думаю. В инструкции этого тоже вроде не пишут… Далее, нимесил, что любят назначать стоматологи на 5 дней после удаления зубов (глупость полная). Этот препарат приводит летальным повреждениям печени, поэтому где-то его запретили, но продолжают продавать в странах 3го мира.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33919499/
https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/187/8/1817/4980325?login=true
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138494/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30677025/
Роаккутан или Аккутан или Изотретиноин. Препарат от акне или прыщей, что применяют когда уже ничего не помогает. Также им иногда лечат онко и аутоиммунные заболевания.
This is a particularly interesting scenario. At the time this drug was released, there was nothing like it on the market. This meant pharmaceutical companies could make huge profits from the complexes of acne sufferers. However, it turned out that, despite its effectiveness against acne, the drug was also highly teratogenic. This means it could harm the fetus during pregnancy. The cunning capitalists didn't hesitate—they clearly described these and other side effects in the instructions and issued specific instructions to doctors regarding prescribing, specifically not to give it to pregnant women. The scheme worked: dermatologists were told that this was the only effective treatment, albeit a bit dangerous, so be careful, and acne sufferers were given hope for a complete cure.
Over time, it turned out that the drug is toxic not only to the fetus. It damages the hypothalamus, which in turn can cause depression that's enough to make you go out the window. This fact was quickly added to the instructions to deflect responsibility. It also reduces ovarian reserve in women, and much more.
But despite all this, the drug is still prescribed to this day, and its promotion is also carried out by dermatologists, for whom the words "apoptosis of hypothalamic neurons" are an empty phrase.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12814338/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25660129/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27671426/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25721216/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34224824/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20708044/
